| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Logdev size? |
| From: | Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2001 10:14:30 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20010724093658.B706@sgi.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <200107241402.f6OE2qD24056@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20010724102533.F31186@dkp.com> <20010724093658.B706@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:36:58AM -0500, Nathan Straz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:25:33AM -0400, Andrew Klaassen wrote: > > That makes me nervous; there isn't a tagged-and-tested CVS > > kernel, is there? > > Nope, especially not on a 1TB IDE RAID5. I'm going to work on running patch-2.4.7-xfs-2001-07-22 through some regression tests and if I have time today I'll try to get the top of the CVS tree built and tested too. I'll put out a quick report before I leave for OLS. -- Nate Straz nstraz@xxxxxxx sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com/ Linux Test Project http://ltp.sf.net/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | xfsrestore assertion failure, Jim Eshleman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Backup ACLs, Juer Lee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Logdev size?, Nathan Straz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Logdev size?, Andrew Klaassen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |