xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: nfs/local performance with software raid5 and xfs and SMP

To: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: nfs/local performance with software raid5 and xfs and SMP
From: Jani Jaakkola <jjaakkol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:53:48 +0300 (EEST)
In-reply-to: <200107231443.f6NEhNB15714@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Steve Lord wrote:

> No performance is not 'fixed' but it is way better than it was in the
> earlier kernels, we had a scenario where it would just stop dead in
> its tracks and not make any forward progress.

Agreed. I did see that behavior with older kernels.

> It is more complex to setup with the external log, but it looks like a
> pretty viable solution - see Tru Huynh's numbers with a raid1 journal,
> this config still has everything protected and is getting good numbers.

Yes, I'm going to rebuild my RAID setup so that I have mirrored
SCSI partitions for my external log (in the same SCSI disks where the
RAID5 array lives, so the performance won't be optimal either, but I
guess it's the best single disk failure protected setup I can manage with
the hw I have).

I'll post my benchmarks as soon as I get the new setup running.

- Jani


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>