xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - userspace

To: Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx (Juergen Hasch), John Trostel <jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx>, (Juergen Hasch) <Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - userspace
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:22:52 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <15O3tg-1LjfN2C@fwd01.sul.t-online.com>
References: <XFMail.20010721165236.jtrostel@connex.com> <XFMail.20010721165236.jtrostel@connex.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 23:03 21-7-2001 +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote:
Hello John,

Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2001 22:52 schrieb John Trostel:
> It will NOT break Samba.  The Samba check just looks to see if acl_get_file
> (or whatever) is available after a -lacl compile call.  If your system
> looks for libraries in both /usr/lib and /lib, it will not break with the
> move.
It breaks for me (SuSE system).
Now I don't claim to be an LSB expert, but IMHO static libraries belong in
/usr/lib and shared libraries can be in /lib (important ones) or sometimes
in /usr/lib.

Ok, so we need some way of splitting this up. Build a patch if you want and submit it.

Cheers


-- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>