| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (fwd) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:27:06 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200107201833.f6KIX7H08390@jen.americas.sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:33:07PM -0500 |
| References: | <200107201833.f6KIX7H08390@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:33:07PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > > This was sent privately, Danny later said he meant to send to the list, > any message mangling is entirely the fault of my mail tool. I expect we > will get something based on this into the tree fairly soon (is anyone > in Australia listening? hint hint). It's early Saturday morning, so other than me - probably not. Tim/Andrew should be able to get this in on Monday. The FILE_OFFSET_BITS problem is odd ... will need investigating. I think it should be safe in the acl package to switch that option off though... I'll need to look into the others, & see if I can remember why it was switched on originally. cheers. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - merge up to 2.4.7, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Isn't 32 MB enough?, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (fwd), Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (fwd), Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |