xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsrestore (Linux) generating Amanda's index

To: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfsrestore (Linux) generating Amanda's index
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:57:35 -0500
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, "amanda-users@xxxxxxxxxx" <amanda-users@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: Message from "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@berdmann.de> of "Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:53:24 +0200." <3B54C1E4.ECD9EC9F@berdmann.de>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Is this actually causing problems, or is it just a query as to why
> > you see the odd names?
> 
> Just being curious... I haven't recognized any problems yet. It just
> causes an annoying listing of mangled filenames in addition to the
> original filename in the index, my SysOps will ask me "How can we rely
> on it if it's messing up the index? Does it mess up the backup, too?"
> and I have to write some more lines in the documentation just to ignore
> these offset names...

I guess if the dump was being split over multiple tape files then it
would be useful to see the fact that a file was split between them.
This may be the original intent of the output.

Are you using real tape media, or a file, I suspect the file case could
be smart enough not to do the split as it does not make a whole lot
of sense there.

Steve
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>