xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks

To: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:23:00 +1200
Cc: Nikita Danilov <NikitaDanilov@xxxxxxxxx>, Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, rsharpe@xxxxxxxxxx, Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010716222927.A9A225F70@lyta.coker.com.au>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10107141752080.18419-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl> <3B5341BA.1F68F755@baldauf.org> <15187.18225.196286.123754@beta.namesys.com> <20010716222927.A9A225F70@lyta.coker.com.au>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:29:27AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:

    Last time I tested this one process could only open slightly more
    than 80,000 files (I am not about to test this at the moment as
    doing so allocates a lot of kernel memory that can't be swapped
    and therefore requires a reboot to regain good performance).

FWIW, I am able to open 1e6 files without any effort whatsoever. Code
attached (just wrote this now).

You need to up /proc/sys/fs/file-max and your ulimit obiously.




  --cw

Attachment: open-me.c
Description: Text Data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>