| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs on notebooks (noflushd etc.) |
| From: | Juri Haberland <list-linux.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:58:36 +0000 (UTC) |
| Distribution: | local |
| Organization: | spoiled dot org |
| References: | <news2mail-20010715165102.42C97E94.NOFFLE@tecklenburg2.spm.de> |
| Reply-to: | Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (OpenBSD/2.9 (i386)) |
thomas graichen <list-linux.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > just out of curiousity: how does xfs interact with things like > noflushd which reduce the disk flushing for more effective ide > poweroff possibilities ... is the flushing below the fs layer > so that it should all work transparently or may it result in > problems with xfs (or journaling fs in general)? Hi Thomas, well, I cannot speak for xfs but with ext3 the disk will only spin down once; after this it will be constantly restarted by the update mechanisms of ext3 (commit interval is 5 seconds). Juri -- Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: DMAPI and dump/restore, Dean Roehrich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfsdump/xfsrestore fails on device nodes, Deti Fliegl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs on notebooks (noflushd etc.), Sidik Isani |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs on notebooks (noflushd etc.), Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |