| To: | thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs on notebooks (noflushd etc.) |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:34:16 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <news2mail-20010715165102.42C97E94.NOFFLE@tecklenburg2.spm. de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 18:51 15-7-2001 +0200, thomas graichen wrote:
just out of curiousity: how does xfs interact with things like noflushd which reduce the disk flushing for more effective ide poweroff possibilities ... is the flushing below the fs layer so that it should all work transparently or may it result in problems with xfs (or journaling fs in general)? If your journal does not get out to disk and the data does not get out to disk and the fs is not touched it would remain consistent. If the journal gets written and the data does not or vice versa you can probably imagine what happens. The question is if both the journal and data end up in the same layer and thus get written at the same time. I think that journal does not travel to disk in the same path that the data does. However this is a bit og guessing, let the brighter people answer this one. Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: mounting XFS fails, Gerwin Brill |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - xfsprogs-1.3.1, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs on notebooks (noflushd etc.), Juri Haberland |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - xfsprogs-1.3.1, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |