| To: | Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Jul 2001 15:57:58 +1200 |
| Cc: | rsharpe@xxxxxxxxxx, Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B50CFF6.4BE90AB0@namesys.com> |
| References: | <Pine.BSI.4.10.10107141752080.18419-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl> <3B507259.4436853E@baldauf.org> <20010715052116.E7056@weta.f00f.org> <3B50D058.3090008@ns.aus.com> <3B50CFF6.4BE90AB0@namesys.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 03:04:22AM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
They still have cookies, so it is still a braindead protocol.
NFS tries to solve some hard-problems.
IMO, requiring the server be stateless sucks, the client IMO should be
responsible for holding state and reaquiring any resources should it
need to.
--cw
|
| Previous by Date: | Tulip driver in 2.4.7-pre6-xfs b0rken, Juha Saarinen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mkfs.xfs compilationa failed, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks, Hans Reiser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks, Hans Reiser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |