xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks

To: Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks
From: Rahul Jain <rahul@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 16:05:44 -0400
Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3B507259.4436853E@baldauf.org>
Mail-followup-to: Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10107141752080.18419-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl> <3B507259.4436853E@baldauf.org>
Reply-to: Rahul Jain <rahul@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 06:24:57PM +0200, Xuan Baldauf wrote:
> 
> 
> Seth Mos wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Xuan Baldauf wrote:
> > > Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> > > > For your Squid cache, don't go XFS, but instead go ReiserFS. It will do 
> > > > a great
> > > > job there. For your Samba or NFS partition, go XFS and not ReiserFS.
> > >
> > > I do not use XFS, currently. Why is XFS better for Samba?
> >
> > Because word documents average 0.1 - 1MB.
> 
> Ah. So you just mean speed (quantity), not some features (quality)-
> 

Actually, XFS supports full ACLs, which is a useful feature when serving up
samba shares, especially to NT/2k clients.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>