| To: | "Steve Lord" <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.6 patch does not apply cleanly to 2.4.6 |
| From: | "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:22:45 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200107101610.f6AGAxu21955@jen.americas.sgi.com> from "Steve Lord" at "Jul 10, 2001 11:10:59 am" |
| Reply-to: | ptb@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
"Steve Lord wrote:" > The linux-xfs patches are pure kernel patches, the cvs ones contain other > information. The FAQ is correct, and the README file contains a description > of what the various patches are. OK, thanks! Turns out I couldn't see the -cvs- part of the name because my browser has chosen blue links on a black background. The -cvs- bit reverses the alphabetic and numerical ordering, so that linux-2.4.6-xfs-cvs-06212001.patch.gz is listed after linux-2.4.6-xfs-07052001.patch.bz2, and the only bit in readable white text is the "bzip2" file type at left in the listing, so I wrongly got the impression that the patch was a bzip version of the patch directly above it, which was a 2.4.5 patch. If that makes sense ... (listing suppresed). Peter |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem with lvm in 2.4.6 and xfs, Craig Tierney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problem with lvm in 2.4.6 and xfs, Craig Tierney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.6 patch does not apply cleanly to 2.4.6, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.6 patch does not apply cleanly to 2.4.6, Peter T. Breuer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |