Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 15:38 6-7-2001 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>Bas wrote:
>> >
>>
>>What I'm planning on doing is taking our 1.0.1 tree (which will be
>>exported via CVS soon), and keep it up to date with "official" Linus
>>kernels, i.e. 2.4.6, 2.4.7, 2.4.8 etc - until 1.0.2 comes out, which
>>will then begin tracking 2.4.9, 2.4.10 (for example). And generate
>>patches along the way (no RPMs for this, probably, too much work...)
>
> me like
> This is a nice way to keep production systems up-to-date and keep the
> -devel tree for al the -pre versions on your test systems separated.
>
>>That way, people who don't necessarily want to track XFS development can
>>still have stable XFS for the latest "Linus" kernel, and those who want
>>to live on the edge can be swept along with the -preX kernels in the
>>devel tree.
>
> Yes Please!
I'd like to second this!
That is what I was always missing about XFS ;-)
Keep on the great work, guys!!!
Juri
--
Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|