xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS vs. JFS

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS vs. JFS
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 07:12:42 -0500
Cc: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Comments: In-reply-to Seth Mos <knuffie@xs4all.nl> message dated "Sun, 01 Jul 2001 13:58:24 +0200."
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010701135304.03a05bb0@pop.xs4all.nl>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> At 12:04 1-7-2001 +0200, Bernhard R. Erdmann wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >how do you think about IBM's JFS for Linux version 1.0 released last
> >friday?
> >http://oss.software.ibm.com/jfs/
> 
> It's great because now we really _do_ have 3 journaling fs.
> It gives people choice which is very important.
> 
> Each has it's own merits but here are some:
> 
> IBM has it's own userbase that has AIX with JFS. Don't know if the layout 
> is compatible.

The JFS IBM released for Linux comes from the OS/2 version, not AIX. I
do not know if they are on disk compatible or not. Steve Best has given
lots of talks, at least some of them should be out on the net for people
to look at. I have not seen one of his talks for several months, so I
cannot comment on features etc of the 1.0 release.

Steve


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>