| To: | Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS corruption on SoftRAID5 |
| From: | Simon Matter <Simon.Matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:52:17 +0200 |
| >received: | from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9724457306; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:02:45 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200106282148.f5SLmfw24451@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20010629090815.02e71aa8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B3C3C56.73D1C11C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yq1bsn745ex.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20010629130641.B782@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Andrew Klaassen schrieb: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 12:28:06PM -0400, > Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > > FWIW, almost all the XFS corruption bugs (with RAID or > > otherwise) I've seen so far have been incorrect IDE hdparm > > tuning or bad cabling. > > My question is really OT for this list, but how might one go > about checking for bad cabling? Is there any software that can > find it consistently? > > Andrew Klaassen IBM's drive fittness test tool claims to test cabling, but I don't know. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS corruption on SoftRAID5, Simon Matter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problem fixed (I think), Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption on SoftRAID5, Simon Matter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption on SoftRAID5, Simon Matter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |