xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS corruption on SoftRAID5

To: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS corruption on SoftRAID5
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:29:56 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20010629130641.B782@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Andrew Klaassen wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 12:28:06PM -0400, 
> Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> > FWIW, almost all the XFS corruption bugs (with RAID or
> > otherwise) I've seen so far have been incorrect IDE hdparm
> > tuning or bad cabling.
> 
> My question is really OT for this list, but how might one go
> about checking for bad cabling?  Is there any software that can
> find it consistently?

If the cable is not correct some cards will report it.
The promise controllers can report if a IDE cable is 80 pins or not.

And the kernel sometimes also gives back errors. I have seen it once
already. The ATA66 and ATA100 standard have CRC checking for data sent
over the cable. However forcing another a transfer mode is dangerous
and does net let a IDE interface set the correct mode on its own.

I don't know if scsi has some form of CRC control.\

Bye



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>