xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SG patches

To: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SG patches
From: Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:22:33 -0400
In-reply-to: <20010629135822.F782@xxxxxxx>; from ak@xxxxxxx on Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:58:22PM -0400
References: <20010626230456.A16389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010629134322.D782@xxxxxxx> <20010629135822.F782@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:58:22PM -0400, Andrew Klaassen wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:43:22PM -0400, 
>Andrew Klaassen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:04:56PM -0400, 
>> Alan Eldridge wrote:
>
>> > There's a scsi generic (sg) patch that needs to go against
>> > 2.4.5 to zap that unkillable process condition I was running
>> > into.
>
>> Is this patch needed for 2.4 kernels under 2.4.5, too?
>
>Lemme make that clearer - is the patch needed for 2.4.0 to 2.4.4
>kernels?
>
>Andrew Klaassen

I do not know. I did not experience the process hang on 2.4.2, and I have
not used 2.4.[34]. 

I will mail to ask the sg driver author and post his answer when I receive
it.

-- 
Alan Eldridge
"Smart Tags? We don't need no steenking Smart Tags!"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>