xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS corruption on SoftRAID5

To: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS corruption on SoftRAID5
From: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:46:27 -0400
In-reply-to: <3B3BC18C.FF7C9E2E@xxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3B3B6A45.3252B37C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B3BC18C.FF7C9E2E@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:45:16PM -0400, 
Bryan J. Smith wrote:

> I thought the whole 2.4 kernel and software RAID-5 was not
> recommended, no matter what fs you use?

Hmm.  I hope not - we've just deployed 300G of IDE drive (using
an onboard controller, no less) on a box running
2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1 over software RAID 5, and plan to deploy
300G more once we've had a chance to tweak and tune and further
stress test the second box.  Other than the highmem bug - which
showed up in testing on the second box, and hasn't yet affected
the first - we haven't experienced any difficulties.

Should we expect some?

Are there some kernel mailing list threads I might want to take
a look at before I dig myself in too deep?

Andrew Klaassen


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>