xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: To devfs or not to devfs

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: To devfs or not to devfs
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:15:41 -0500
References: <17376.993612424@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Keith Owens wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:34:58 +0930,
> David Lloyd <lloy0076@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >I use the RedHat kernel distro. Would it be asking too much to have two
> >ISO's, one with devfs on and the other not?
> 
> Just boot with "devfs=nomount".  No need for two images.

Although... Red Hat tells us that there are race conditions and root
exploits when using devfs, even if it is not mounted.  I have not
investigated this.... but I'm more and more inclined to just ship the
new RPMs with no devfs at all, and let the power-users who want the
cutting edge devfs stuff recompile their kernel...

And yes, 2 isos just for devfs options is too much to ask for.  :)

-Eric

-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>