xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

To devfs or not to devfs

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: To devfs or not to devfs
From: Dean Brissinger <brissing@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:10:35 -0600
In-reply-to: <3B38B0AE.6F52AD0@xxxxxxx>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010626123529.03fc80f8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20010626130421.03fc6d00@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B386DF9.AAC07E7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B38B0AE.6F52AD0@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 10:56 AM -0500 6/26/01, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:

 > So what you are saying is that this has been changed since 1.0? I seem to
 > remember that this wouldn't boot at all when I first installed it, and that
 > installing devfs via "rescue mode" resolved the problems.

For XFS 1.0 / RH 7.1, we released our own version of devfsd, which was
essentially Mandrake's patched devfsd, with some config file magic to
try to handle /dev/mouse and /dev/cdrom transparently.

In any case, mounting devfs on /dev will not be the default in 1.0.1.

I personally have had problems keeping /dev/cdrom working but have been under the impression that devfs was needed for most of the SGI tools to work. Will all the other [non XFS] OSS SGI stuff work regardless? I also heard a rumor that devfs was used to work around some problems booting from an XFS partition (much like one can't boot from ReiserFS).

It all boils down to one question. Is devfs a good thing to use or not?

--
   . . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
   .                                               .
   .    Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator    .
. Direct: 303-583-0278 Main: 303-444-0094 . . Fax: 303-583-0246 http://www.vexcel.com/ .
   .                                               .
   . . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
                         0 0
                        '````

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>