Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1

xfs

Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1

To:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1
From:	Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:34:48 -0400
In-reply-to:	<200106261415.f5QEFoW22635@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 09:15:50AM -0500
Mail-followup-to:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References:	<ak@xxxxxxx> <200106261356.f5QDuDv22566@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010626100947.D16841@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200106261415.f5QEFoW22635@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.2i

On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 09:15:50AM -0500, 
Steve Lord wrote:

> > Is 1 Gig highmem?

> It is if you are running the correct kernel, cat /proc/meminfo
> if the HighTotal line is non-zero you are running highmem.

Ah.  Indeed.  Thanks much.  Will upgrade to PR2 promptly.

Andrew Klaassen

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Andrew Klaassen Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Keith Owens Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Andrew Klaassen Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Steve Lord Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Andrew Klaassen Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Steve Lord Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Andrew Klaassen <= Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Steve Lord Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Russell Cattelan Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Andrew Klaassen

Previous by Date:	Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Steve Lord
Next by Date:	Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Steve Lord
Previous by Thread:	Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Steve Lord
Next by Thread:	Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Steve Lord
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]