| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New Redhat 7.1 kernel patch |
| From: | Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:02:10 +1200 (NZST) |
| Cc: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3B37A581.5D0F333F@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Linux XFS is _not_ based on RH's distro, that's just one convenient way > that we package it for the masses. :) XFS development has always been > based on Linus' tree. > > Red Hat RPMs are just a "fun" (?!) side project for Linux XFS. Aiiee... OK, lemme rephrase the question, your honour: if I would like to set up an XFS server, which part should I go with? As it is, won't most people use the "RH XFS" version, ie. install from the ISOs? -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Installing RH 7.1 XFS from a network using a floppy, Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New Redhat 7.1 kernel patch, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New Redhat 7.1 kernel patch, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New Redhat 7.1 kernel patch, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |