Re: /dev/sound

xfs

Re: /dev/sound

To:	Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: /dev/sound
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:42:04 -0500
Cc:	Dusan <dusan@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References:	<Pine.LNX.4.21.0106242053080.7937-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010625003153.A4433@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

Alan Eldridge wrote:
> 
> These things are *not* the fault of the SGI dudes!

Well, it WAS our (ill-advised?) decision to enable devfs in our
RPMs...    FWIW, in the 1.0.1 testing RPMs, devfs is enabled, but NOT
mounted by default.  That way you can edit lilo.conf to get devfs if you
want it, otherwise you get your good old familiar 10,000-entry
inode-eating on-disk /dev.  And maybe we'll be able to stop talking
about devfs on this list in 6 months or so.  :)

-Eric

-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
/dev/sound, Dusan Re: /dev/sound, Eric Sandeen Re: /dev/sound, Juha Saarinen Re: /dev/sound, Nathan J. Mehl Re: /dev/sound, Alan Eldridge Re: /dev/sound, Eric Sandeen <= Re: /dev/sound, Simon Matter Re: /dev/sound, Eric Sandeen Re: /dev/sound, Nathan J. Mehl Re: /dev/sound, Russell Cattelan

Previous by Date:	Re: /dev/sound, Juha Saarinen
Next by Date:	One other deadly RH weirdness, Alan Eldridge
Previous by Thread:	Re: /dev/sound, Alan Eldridge
Next by Thread:	Re: /dev/sound, Simon Matter
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]