xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS installation on Compaq ML 350

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS installation on Compaq ML 350
From: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:49:09 +0200
>received: from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6031357306; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:54:48 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Sauter AG, Basel
References: <200106221455.f5MEtkB32455@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Steve Lord schrieb:
> 
> >
> > I was having similar problems when installing on a new system. Some
> > programs just dumped core, after reboot ather progs dumped, other where
> > missing and so on. rpm -Va told me that lots of files had wrong MD5
> > sums. I posted to this list but there was just one reply about bad
> > hardware. Well, it was NOT cheap hardware, DELL Precision WS with i820
> > Camino Chipset, Promise controller... Well it could be bad hardware
> > anyway but I felt unsure because I have never had a system wich was
> > unreliable and I tried really everything and changed every peace of
> > hardware. /var was big enough.
> >
> > If you are able to run the system and rpm -Va works, try to run rpm -Va
> > > file.[#] several times and compare them. Would be interesting to know what
> > comes out.
> >
> > Simon
> >
> 
> Yes, I vaguely remember this, I apologise for letting you fall through the
> cracks, it is difficult to keep track of everything which is going on.
> 
> Have you tried running with ext2 on this hardware, but with an xfs kernel
> and trying some tests on an xfs partition? It would be nice to establish
> what is really going on here.
> 
> Steve

I didn't try ext2. All filesystems were on top of SoftRAID1 or
SoftRAID5. / was on md1(hda5/hdb5). Usually I do RAID over two channels
(md1(hda5/hdc5)) but for testing I didn't because of lack of UDMA
cables. I then found out that randomly different files were corrupt. For
example vi dumped core, after reboot vi went fine but rpm dumped core
and so on. Since UDMA uses CRC I thought it should be safe and I was
using 2 different UDMA controllers with the same effect. By now I'm sure
it has something to do with having two disks on one channel (corrupt DMA
transfers, errors in i820 chipset) because I made a new install on just
one disk and there was not one problem again. Unfortunately I don't have
the machines anymore to make more test.

If anybody is using i820 based motherboards and has two UDMA disks on
the same IDE channel, please try a SoftRAID1 install of RH-7.1-XFS and
test around with it.

Simon



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>