xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: lost+found

To: "Thomas von Steiger" <thomas.vonsteiger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: lost+found
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:02:08 -0500
Cc: "Deti Fliegl" <deti@xxxxxxxxx>, "Joshua Baker-LePain" <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Comments: In-reply-to "Thomas von Steiger" <thomas.vonsteiger@xxxxxxxxxx> message dated "Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:56:43 +0200."
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106161320550.27379-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B2B9A04.12BDDC7A@xxxxxxxxx> <01f901c0faa5$71404880$6402a8c0@rubistar>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Thanks,
> 
> If a xfs Filesystem is 100% full, is it posible for xfs_repair to build a
> temp lost+found ?
> Repair is wunderfull, if i have a power interrupt...!!
> 
> regards,
> thomas
> 

Well, since lost+found is relinking existing files from elsewhere which
have become disconnected it potentially does not consume any space at
all, presuming that:

 o there is room in the root directory for one extra entry without adding
   a new disk block.

 o there is a spare inode somewhere - remember these are allocated in
   chunks and never freed, so chances are good.

 o All the lost+found entries fit in the directory inode.

But even if all of these fail, 4 disk blocks is probably all it
takes at maximum, maybe more if there are lots of entries to
recover.

So it depends on your definition of full.

Steve


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>