| To: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! |
| From: | Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:28:37 +1200 (NZST) |
| Cc: | Knuth Posern <posern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.BSI.4.10.10106172243450.29025-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Seth Mos wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Knuth Posern wrote:
>
> 2.96 needs to be tested fr some cases. I'd rather skip the work on 2.96
> and start on 3 when it will be released.
2.96 -{81|85} have both produced file system corruption for me
> > I tried to get the 2.91.66 C and C++ compiler installed on my system. But
> > it failed. And I don't know exactly why...
On RH, you'll need the compat-egcs packages, plus the compat-libs one.
-- Juha
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Thomas Duffy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS source before porting to linux, crossfs |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and RAID5, Jure Pecar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |