Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!

To:	Knuth Posern <posern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:37:36 +0200
Cc:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.GSO.4.21.0106172051200.25342-100000@hadar>; from posern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:25:22PM +0200
References:	<Pine.GSO.4.21.0106172051200.25342-100000@hadar>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i

It's very simple: Software or any RAID is definitely not a replacement for 
backups.  If you care about your data, always backup it. If you don't care
about it feel free to use experimental software to store it, like XFS, but
when you should lose it later blame nobody but yourself.


-Andi

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: 3ware (was Re: XFS and RAID5), (continued) Re: 3ware (was Re: XFS and RAID5), Tru Huynh Re: 3ware (was Re: XFS and RAID5), Juha Saarinen Re: XFS and RAID5, Shawn L Johnston Re: XFS and RAID5, Simon Matter Re: XFS and RAID5, Robin Humble Re: XFS and RAID5, Andrew Klaassen Re: XFS and RAID5, Robin Humble Re: XFS and RAID5, Ingo Juergensmann Re: XFS and RAID5, Jure Pecar Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Juha Saarinen Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Andi Kleen <= Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Thomas Duffy

Previous by Date:	Xfs Compile problem, Reggy Ekkebus
Next by Date:	Re: Xfs Compile problem, Alan Eldridge
Previous by Thread:	Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Juha Saarinen
Next by Thread:	Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Thomas Duffy
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]