| To: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Samba panic with ACLs |
| From: | Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx (Juergen Hasch) |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:07:04 +0200 |
| Cc: | jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <3B2F91DE.B3D2AEE1@xxxxxxxxxxx> <XFMail.20010619165236.jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx> <20010620105507.O280523@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Timothy Shimmin schrieb: > > Hi Juergen and John, > > I think it should be changed to malloc() space for the > qualifier as Juergen suggested. > > The pseudo standard is hard to read as normal (IMHO:), > but it does indicate that we should call acl_free() when > we are done with it. (It does say to do this if it is releasable > memory - but how is the caller supposed to know whether it is > or isn't). > > So we have no choice if we are supposed to call acl_free(). > I will change it unless someone can convince me otherwise :) This is what I was thinking of, I believe it's the right way to do so. A big thank you for adding it so quick !! ...Juergen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: WG: <No Subject>, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: FAQ update, Thomas Duffy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Samba panic with ACLs, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS FAQ, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |