On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 09:18:57AM +1000, Andrew Gildfind wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:25:45AM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:36:38 +0300,
> > "Tarkan Erimer" <tarkane@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > [question about the implementation of ACLs on XFS and ext2]
> >
> > There are at least two groups working on ACLs for Linux and they
> > disagree about how they should be implemented. SGI has one
> > implementation of ACL, included in the XFS patch. Andreas Gr|nbacher's
> > ACLs are different and will not work with XFS.
> >
>
> To clarify that, we don't disagree at all, we're gradually working towards
> a common implementation. Things have moved slowly, but we have a friendly
> relationship with the ext2 people, and in due course we want to merge
> our efforts. Hopefully there will be more visible progress in the next
> couple of months.
What exactly are the differences in the implementations of ACLs?
What are the points that you could (so far) not agree on?A
Where do you already have already agreed on? (Except being POSIX
compliant :))
Cheers
Martin
--
Some of my readers ask me what a "Serial Port" is.
The answer is: I don't know.
Is it some kind of wine you have with breakfast?
pgpsoJLcN1Dms.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|