xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS and RAID5

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS and RAID5
From: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:17:29 -0400
In-reply-to: <200106181655.QAA11308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:55:26AM +1000
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20010618091334.A2209@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200106181655.QAA11308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:55:26AM +1000, 
Robin Humble wrote:

> Contrary to popular belief, using both master and slave only
> gets you a ~5% performance hit.

(?)!

That would be very, very good news.  Has anybody else tried
this?  Have you load tested the machines and seen smooth
performance degradation, no nasty bottlenecks (or whatever it is
that is supposed to happen when master and slave are both used
in an array)?

(Am I asking these question on the wrong forum?  Apologies...)

Andrew Klaassen


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>