| To: | Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: lost+found |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Jun 2001 19:35:36 +0200 |
| Cc: | Thomas von Steiger <thomas.vonsteiger@xxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106161320550.27379-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from jlb17@xxxxxxxx on Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:22:15PM -0400 |
| References: | <001801c0f688$afe37b00$6402a8c0@rubistar> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106161320550.27379-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:22:15PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 at 7:20pm, Thomas von Steiger wrote > > > If i create a XFS Filesystem on Disk, has this Filesystem a lost+found > > inside ? > > I have a XFS Filesystem on a old Redhat 6.1, becose there is no lost+found. > > There's no lost+found. I'm assuming that's because of the journal and the > fact that "lost" items are "found" in place. They may be corrupt if they > were being written, but they won't be lost. xfsrepair seems to create lost+found on the fly when it needs it, i.e. when orphaned inodes are found. On a 100% full file system with no place to create it you're probably out of luck. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: lost+found, Joshua Baker-LePain |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: lost+found, Deti Fliegl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: lost+found, Joshua Baker-LePain |
| Next by Thread: | Re: lost+found, Deti Fliegl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |