| To: | "'Russell Cattelan'" <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Bryan J. Smith'" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Interest from the FreeBSD camp |
| From: | "Juha Saarinen" <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:12:26 +1200 |
| Cc: | "'Eric Sandeen'" <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <3B28152A.9FC9E865@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
[cc list trimmed] I'm terribly sorry, I only meant to ask what I thought was a perfectly simple question about XFS and FreeBSD... I didn't meant for this thread to turn into a licensing flame-fest. :: What are you talking about? :: What you are saying all of the non GPL'ed linux kernel :: modules are in :: violation of the GPL?! :: Guess somebody better stick some lawyers on Nvidia. :: Ohh and explain this problem to Linus also. Well, nVidia's kernel drivers/modules are only partly GPL, right? There's a binary component with code from SGI (correct me if I'm wrong) and others, that isn't GPL. -- Juha |
| Previous by Date: | Re: mkinitrd, ramdisk failure?, D. Stimits |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mkinitrd, ramdisk failure?, Walt H |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp, Bryan J. Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp, Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |