xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp

To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp
From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:59:12 -0400
Cc: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@xxxxxxxxx>, james rich <james.rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: SmithConcepts, Inc.
References: <20010613024149.Z8330@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.05.10106131114130.26115-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010613181536.G8330@xxxxxxxxx> <3B2814FA.92B290A8@xxxxxxxx> <3B28152A.9FC9E865@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Russell Cattelan wrote:
> What are you talking about?
> What you are saying all of the non  GPL'ed linux kernel modules are in
> violation of  the GPL?!
> Guess somebody better stick some lawyers  on Nvidia.
> Ohh and explain this problem to Linus also.

Okay, I retract that.  The GPL _does_ have a provision for linking
against core system files (like the kernel).

-- TheBS

-- 
Bryan J. Smith   mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx   chat:thebs413
SmithConcepts, Inc.           http://www.SmithConcepts.com
==========================================================
Linux 'Worms' exploit known security holes that were fixed
3-12 months earlier.  NT/2000 'Worms' exploit unknown se-
curity holes that won't be fixed for another 3-12 months.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>