Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??

To:	Dan Swartzendruber <dswartz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??
From:	jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:38:50 -0400 (EDT)
Cc:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.33.0106092333550.4352-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:	Connex
Reply-to:	jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

XFmail is threaded, does IMAP and is free!

(and is what I use)

On 10-Jun-2001 Dan Swartzendruber wrote:

> seems.  if i can get a nice threaded mail client with IMAP support,
> i'd move my mail from win98 to KDE in a flash.
-- 
John M. Trostel
Linux OS Engineer
Connex
jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, (continued) Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Bryan J. Smith Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Dan Swartzendruber Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Bryan J. Smith Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Dan Swartzendruber [OT] Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Juri Haberland Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Florin Andrei Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Steven Lembark Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Ric Tibbetts Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Mike Burger Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Dan Swartzendruber Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, jtrostel <= Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Dan Swartzendruber Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Ric Tibbetts Re[2]: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Keith Matthews

Previous by Date:	Re: mkinitrd, ramdisk failure?, Chris Pascoe
Next by Date:	Re: mkinitrd, ramdisk failure?, Chris Pascoe
Previous by Thread:	Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Dan Swartzendruber
Next by Thread:	Re: XFS/Linux 1.1??, Dan Swartzendruber
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]