xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp
From: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:42:44 -0400
Cc: "Jeffrey B. Layton" <jeffrey.b.layton@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010613174357.A24061@xxxxxxxxxx>; from hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:43:57PM +0200
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106111207380.5609-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B24E5A1.7404BFBA@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3B24E732.D3A3C8A6@xxxxxxx> <3B24EE05.F7E46B6C@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20010613024149.Z8330@xxxxxxxxx> <3B272FE8.97A8F575@xxxxxxxx> <20010613113111.B8330@xxxxxxxxx> <20010613174357.A24061@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In the immortal words of Christoph Hellwig (hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:31:11AM -0400, Nathan J. Mehl wrote:
> > Nope.  By default, Sun uses plain-ol-UFS.  (As of 2.8, they added
> > metadata logging.)
> 
> Metadate-logging exists in SDS for about 5 years...

Correct: see my initial post's mention of SDS. :)

(Indeed, one thing I've always wondered is if Sol 8's "logging" fstab
option is just the "metatrans" code diked out of SDS and dropped into
the core OS, or if it's something completely different, and what would
happen if you gave a logging UFS partition a trans log...)

-n

------------------------------------------------------<memory@xxxxxxxxx>
"`You understand the concepts of breaking down a human psyche.'  Well
sure, I work for Warner Bros."                                   (--JMS)
<http://blank.org/memory/>----------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>