xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stability of the Red Hat 7.1 + XFS system

To: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Stability of the Red Hat 7.1 + XFS system
From: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 02:44:25 -0400
Cc: Micah Yoder <yodermk@xxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106121000040.5609-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:04:01AM +1200
References: <01061114170409.01070@eclipse> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106121000040.5609-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In the immortal words of Juha Saarinen (juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Micah Yoder wrote:
> 
> > I just installed RH 7.1 w/SGI's CD and the kernel on it.  The server is
> > co-located, about 400 miles away...
> 
> Is this the VIA chip set box? Evil stuff... ;-)

I think you're mistaking this gentleman's problem for mine.  As much
as I'm enjoying my little test run with xfs, I'm nowhere near
confident enough to use it on a remotely colocated production machine
yet. :)

-n

------------------------------------------------------------<memory@xxxxxxxxx>
"There are certain phrases that inspire an instinctive dread in moviegoers: 
`Tarantino-esque'; `big in France'; `starring Andy Garcia.'" (--M.E. Williams)
<http://blank.org/memory/>----------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>