xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Stability of the Red Hat 7.1 + XFS system

To: "'Bryan J. Smith'" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Stability of the Red Hat 7.1 + XFS system
From: "Juha Saarinen" <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:31:27 +1200
Cc: "'Micah Yoder'" <yodermk@xxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3B25702B.E9763DAC@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
:: Depends on the revision of the Tiger 133.  Tyan is like the
:: Microsoft of the mainboard world.  You gotta wait for revision C or
:: D before it's good.  Late revisions of the Tiger 133 are quite
:: stable.  But early revisions?  Watch out!

Yeah, I managed to avoid that trap... got a revision F motherboard here.

:: I personally cannot stand people who say "this company sucks, or
:: that company sucks."  It all comes down to specific parts and
:: models.  E.g., the ViA 686A (Ultra66) southbridge has compatibility
:: and performance problems galore, but the newer ViA 686B (Ultra100)
:: bests the ICH2 (Ultra100) southbridge in most people's eyes (and has
:: a higher handwidth channel to the northbridge too).

I've got the Apollo Pro 133A set with the VT82c596B South Bridge. I can
honestly say that it doesn't work as well as an Intel 440BX solution.

-- Juha


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>