| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:43:47 -0500 |
| Cc: | Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106111207380.5609-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B24E5A1.7404BFBA@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Russell Cattelan wrote: > Two finding anybody in SGI management that actually wants > XFS on BSD to happen and thus willing to commit resources to > writing a "dual" licensee. Remember that one of the most time-consuming, difficult parts of this project early on was handling the "lawyer issues" - I saw one slide that said a couple lawyers quit in the process.... :) Tackling that all over again would probably not be a high priority. Also, you have to think about "what would SGI gain from a BSD port?" - what would justify the extra expense for the company? XFS for Linux is a strategic move for SGI, it's not a purely altruistic project. :) -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |