xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: XFS/Linux 1.1??

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re[2]: XFS/Linux 1.1??
From: Keith Matthews <keith_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 08:05:59 +0100 (BST)
In-reply-to: <3B22D1F6.434FFE0A@xxxxxxxx>
References: <200106092337.f59Nb4E15754@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <3B22D1F6.434FFE0A@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 09 Jun 2001 21:48:38 -0400 Bryan J. Smith <Bryan J. Smith 
<b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:

> 
> BTW, I see RedHat has added the Ext3 patch to their 2.4.5-0.2.9
> release, but I've see nothing but "problems" on the Ext3 list
> (although a lot are Ext2 issues under 2.4.x as well).  IMHO, I think
> Tweedie/RedHat should just focus on getting full data journaling
> complete (I'm still wondering why I tried to do meta-data
> journaling) and leave any "advanced" features to other JFS' like
> XFS. 

Because if you are running a DBMS the last thing you want is the OS
_also_ journalling main data writes, metadata is all that you want.

For the record I spoke to Stephen at the Linux Conference in
Birmingham 2 years ago and he stated then that metadata only was
actually more difficult than journalling  everything.  Steve may want
to comment further.

([OT] PS, is it pure chance that 3 of the filesystem leading names are
'Stephen' ? (g))

--
Keith Matthews                  Spam trap - my real account at this 
                                                        node is keith_m
Frequentous Consultants  - Linux Services, 
                Oracle development & database administration



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>