| To: | Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option |
| From: | ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner) |
| Date: | Sat, 9 Jun 2001 15:24:24 +1000 |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106091355350.8012-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Russel Ingram wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Ivan Rayner wrote: > > The argument to -b should be bytes, so 16k would be 16384 not 16. > > > > If this doesn't fix your problem, could you use -v5 to get verbose output. > > (This might produce alot of output, so you should redirect it to a file.) > > > > Ivan > It wasn't clear (to me anyway) what the syntax on the -b option was > supposed to be to get 16k blocksize, so thanks. Agreed. I'll update the man page next week. Ivan -- Ivan Rayner ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option, Russel Ingram |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | chacl, Sebastian Dransfeld |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option, Russel Ingram |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option, Russel Ingram |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |