| To: | Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Running kernel w/o RH patches ... |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 09 Jun 2001 14:35:44 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Fri, 08 Jun 2001 23:38:37 -0400." <20010608233837.A11062@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 23:38:37 -0400, Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Knowing how heavily patched the RH kernels are (!!), does anyone know if >there'd be impairment or malfunction running a stock + xfs kernel on a RH >system? I know that Russell Cattelan did an XFS+kdb patch for Redhat 7.1. I also know it took a *looong* time, fitting just the kdb patch into all the RH bits and pieces from the -ac tree took me about 8 hours, and I had all the tools to do the job. Russell, did that XFS for RH 7.1 patch get released? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Proper bug report on RH-2.4.5 config failure :), Keith Owens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ..., Alan Eldridge |
| Previous by Thread: | Running kernel w/o RH patches ..., Alan Eldridge |
| Next by Thread: | Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ..., Alan Eldridge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |