At 19:26 8-6-2001 +0200, Thomas Winkler wrote:
John Trostel wrote:
> Your best bet would be to try using the latest XFS CVS in combination
with the
> latest SAMBA_2_2 CVS download. Both of these have had related improvements
> since the official releases of both XFS 1.0 and Samba 2.2.0. I know that we
> (Connex) are using this type of combination for allowing domain members to
> change NT-like ACLs on Samba 2.2.0 (using a 2.4.3 CVS of XFS and a more
recent
> CVS of Samba).
did some testing with 2.4.4 CVS XFS in combination with CVS checkout of
Head. i guess that should be working, but it's not. once again our
system crashed and i had to reboot aour machine. i just can't switch our
servers to using xfs until i got a solution on this one. imagine users
trying to change acls on our server...
Try the most recent CVS of xfs. It's at 2.4.6-pre1 now which seems to do
well in NFS serving btw. I just finished some tests with a linux server and
linux/NCR MP-RAS clients.
NCR MP-RAS SVR4 client
Linux 2.4.6-pre1 server
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
100 8677 73.5 8386 27.4 9817 35.3 22555 99.8 102400 100.0 3305.8 139.7
1000 8664 77.1 7276 30.0 2722 14.9 6024 43.9 7146 21.2 96.3 12.4
2000 8677 77.6 7268 33.2 3107 16.4 6042 44.2 7148 20.7 73.8 10.6
Linux 2.4.4-xfs client
Linux 2.4.6-pre1-xfs server
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
256 7574 98.7 11100 8.4 5402 6.9 8011 92.5 11029 7.7 344.6 4.4
2000 7461 96.7 11115 8.2 5054 6.5 8026 97.9 10065 7.1 100.6 1.4
Impressive! Our 3Com 3300 Switch was reading 99/100 procent usage :-)
by the way, the server doesn't crash every time. gotta do some more
testing to tell the cause, but our test server is kind of broken right
now.
Dump some errors in the mailing list and maybe we can figure out what's
going wrong.
Cheers
--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.
|