| To: | "SCHOENWETTER,SEBASTIAN (HP-Belgium,ex1)" <sebastian_schoenwetter@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Guaranteed datarate (Was: Re: does it work on 2.4.4) |
| From: | "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Jun 2001 13:36:35 +0200 |
| Cc: | "'Austin Gonyou'" <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rahul Jain <rahul@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <FD93D5954435D411BBDB00D0B747A8C1028DE11F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | "SCHOENWETTER,SEBASTIAN (HP-Belgium,ex1)" <sebastian_schoenwetter@xxxxxx>, 'Austin Gonyou' <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rahul Jain <rahul@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
>> "SCHOENWETTER,SEBASTIAN (HP-Belgium,ex1)" <sebastian_schoenwetter@xxxxxx> >> writes: > But is that due to a good CPU which is able to handle all those > tasks, good scsi setup, ... ? That's likely. Guaranteed rate I/O (GRIO) works only with XFS filesystems (this is true on IRIX) and not on Linux. Just to clarify: Someone asked why the XFS patch is so large. I just said the XFS patch also includes some GRIO stuff. I didn't mean to say that the feature is implemented on Linux (in fact, it's not, if you use the corresponding ioctl it will return ENOSYS). Remember that XFS is not Linux specific, and it'd be a nightmare to maintain two completely different source trees, one for Linux and one for IRIX. -- Marcelo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Guaranteed datarate (Was: Re: does it work on 2.4.4), SCHOENWETTER,SEBASTIAN (HP-Belgium,ex1) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Guaranteed datarate (Was: Re: does it work on 2.4.4), Austin Gonyou |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Guaranteed datarate (Was: Re: does it work on 2.4.4), SCHOENWETTER,SEBASTIAN (HP-Belgium,ex1) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Guaranteed datarate (Was: Re: does it work on 2.4.4), Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |