| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New files on xfs ftp site |
| From: | ctooley@xxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:25:22 -0500 |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
So if I want to upgrade to 2.4.5 via building a kernel RPM (I know this seems
odd, but I've got 4 machines running XFS and would just like to keep them
consistent) what all would I have to apply to 2.4.5 code to be able to repace
the 2.4.2 code in the SRPM?
Chris Tooley
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx> on 06/01/2001 07:25:55 AM
To: Jochen Scharrlach
<Jochen.Scharrlach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx(bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA)
Subject Re: New files on xfs ftp site
:
>> Jochen Scharrlach <Jochen.Scharrlach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> - are they bleeding-edge CVS code?
It's taken off the CVS tree and diff'ed against a fresh 2.4.5 tree. It
applies cleanly (just checked this to be sure).
AFAICT (don't take my word for this, I use neither RH nor the SGI
release) the "1.0" release is 2.4.2 + XFS at that time + "this really
needs to be fixed" kind of patches.
HTH,
--
Marcelo
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: does it work on 2.4.4, Marcelo E. Magallon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Path failover with xfs on linux, Christian, Chip |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New files on xfs ftp site, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New files on xfs ftp site, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |