| To: | Dean Brissinger <brissing@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: To devfs or not to devfs |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:12:31 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010626123529.03fc80f8@pop.xs4all.nl> <4.3.2.7.2.20010626130421.03fc6d00@pop.xs4all.nl> <3B386DF9.AAC07E7@kscanners.com> <3B38B0AE.6F52AD0@sgi.com> <p05100306b75e7e8f7f56@[192.168.1.17]> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Dean Brissinger wrote: > I personally have had problems keeping /dev/cdrom working but > have been under the impression that devfs was needed for most of the > SGI tools to work. Will all the other [non XFS] OSS SGI stuff work > regardless? I also heard a rumor that devfs was used to work around > some problems booting from an XFS partition (much like one can't boot > from ReiserFS). No, devfs did mask one problem early on in the 1.0 prereleases, but it's no longer required in any way for XFS. > It all boils down to one question. Is devfs a good thing to > use or not? It can solve a lot of problems in some situations, but the migration can be painful, and it takes up a lot of OT bandwidth on this list, so it will probably be disabled next time around. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: To devfs or not to devfs, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Oops - 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.1_PR1, Andrew Klaassen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: To devfs or not to devfs, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Integration of XFS into Linux source/major dists?, Daniel Stone |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |