xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: To devfs or not to devfs

To: Dean Brissinger <brissing@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: To devfs or not to devfs
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:12:31 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010626123529.03fc80f8@pop.xs4all.nl> <4.3.2.7.2.20010626130421.03fc6d00@pop.xs4all.nl> <3B386DF9.AAC07E7@kscanners.com> <3B38B0AE.6F52AD0@sgi.com> <p05100306b75e7e8f7f56@[192.168.1.17]>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dean Brissinger wrote:

>         I personally have had problems keeping /dev/cdrom working but
> have been under the impression that devfs was  needed for most of the
> SGI tools to work.  Will all the other [non XFS] OSS SGI stuff work
> regardless?  I also heard a rumor that devfs was used to work around
> some problems booting from an XFS partition (much like one can't boot
> from ReiserFS).

No, devfs did mask one problem early on in the 1.0 prereleases, but it's
no longer required in any way for XFS.
 
>         It all boils down to one question.  Is devfs a good thing to
> use or not?

It can solve a lot of problems in some situations, but the migration can
be painful, and it takes up a lot of OT bandwidth on this list, so it
will probably be disabled next time around.

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>