| To: | Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Integration of XFS into Linux source/major dists? |
| From: | Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:51:40 +1000 |
| Cc: | Toralf Lund <toralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106260706220.18895-100000@linux.compucomis.net> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Toralf Lund <toralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organisation: | Sadly lacking |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106260706220.18895-100000@linux.compucomis.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 07:07:34AM -0400, Mike Burger wrote: > They're plans are exactly what the Red Hat source said...they're working > toward getting their code approved, for inclusion, by Linus Torvalds. > Not much winds up in a distribution level kernel unless it's already been > approved by Linus. Um, you haven't actually seen this for yourself, have you? Not much goes into Debian (most that does is stuff that's already in the latest -pre, just backported by Xu), but RedHat is absolutely amazing. Download their kernel source one time, at one stage they had over 200 individual patches in. It's like all of their packages, they have stacks of patches that generally break stuff, and that they never submit upstream anyway.</rant> -- Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx> <Nuke> "can NE1 help me aim nuclear weaponz????? /MSG ME!!" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Integration of XFS into Linux source/major dists?, Daniel Stone |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Integration of XFS into Linux source/major dists?, Toralf Lund |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Integration of XFS into Linux source/major dists?, Mike Burger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Integration of XFS into Linux source/major dists?, Toralf Lund |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |