| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: GCC 3.0 |
| From: | daedalus@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:58:18 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <2d87jtgi85qrqfcc4k9upbg2bi8roapj1f@4ax.com> |
| References: | <01061905432702.09592@localhost.localdomain> <020d01c0f871$141afdc0$0a01a8c0@den2> <4.3.2.7.2.20010619085055.037b8a18@pop.xs4all.nl> <2d87jtgi85qrqfcc4k9upbg2bi8roapj1f@4ax.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 21:51:59 +0200, daedalus@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >linux/kernel/timer.c >linux/include/linux/sched.h Andrea Arcangeli had already answered to a question like mine on the LKML and even before answering he had already put a patch at: ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.6pre2aa2/00_gcc-30-volatile-xtime-1 Do you think it is worth to be merged into patch-2.4.x-xfs-1.0.x-core? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Access control lists, Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: GCC 3.0, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: GCC 3.0, daedalus |
| Next by Thread: | Re: GCC 3.0, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |