Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!

xfs

Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!

To:	Knuth Posern <posern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!
From:	Thomas Duffy <tduffy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	21 Jun 2001 12:37:22 -0700
Cc:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, seth.mos@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.GSO.4.21.0106172051200.25342-100000@hadar>
References:	<Pine.GSO.4.21.0106172051200.25342-100000@hadar>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

I have a 180G RAID 5 array with xfs that spans 12 disks.  It has been
serving ~50 clients daily without reboot for 4 months and no corruption.
I even had one disk go bad, replaced it an the array was able to
reincorporate it and be happy.

And I just setup a RAID 0 array with 4 disks that is 120G.  I have had
good luck with both.

-tduffy

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: 3ware (was Re: XFS and RAID5), (continued) Re: 3ware (was Re: XFS and RAID5), Juha Saarinen Re: XFS and RAID5, Shawn L Johnston Re: XFS and RAID5, Simon Matter Re: XFS and RAID5, Robin Humble Re: XFS and RAID5, Andrew Klaassen Re: XFS and RAID5, Robin Humble Re: XFS and RAID5, Ingo Juergensmann Re: XFS and RAID5, Jure Pecar Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Juha Saarinen Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Andi Kleen Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Thomas Duffy <=

Previous by Date:	Re: XFS + LVM + GFS + Oracle(or any other DB), Adam Cioccarelli
Next by Date:	Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Juha Saarinen
Previous by Thread:	Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?!, Andi Kleen
Next by Thread:	Xfs Compile problem, Reggy Ekkebus
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]