| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | fsstress |
| From: | Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:36:09 +1200 (NZST) |
| Cc: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200106181830.f5IIUZq28997@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Well, I just ran ./fsstress -d /usr -p 16 -n 100000 a few times here, to see if XFS 2.4.6-pre3 compiled with gcc 2.96-85 (from RH Rawhide) would go to the great debugger in the sky. It didn't. Just doing it again... the system is quite responsive, with top showing both CPUs (500MHz P3s) being used 30-60%. No swap usage! :-) This system is booted from a single IDE drive at the moment. Will try with the dual SCSI drive set up in a bit. -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: oops with 2.4.5 + xfs + md raid0, Jim Wright |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Stress test 015 need to check partition size, Daniel Moore |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Testing XFS+RAID5, Juha Saarinen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Testing XFS+RAID5, Andrew Klaassen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |