xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stability of the Red Hat 7.1 + XFS system

To: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Stability of the Red Hat 7.1 + XFS system
From: Micah Yoder <yodermk@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:10:25 -0400
Cc: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106121000040.5609-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106121000040.5609-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > I just installed RH 7.1 w/SGI's CD and the kernel on it.  The server is
> > co-located, about 400 miles away...
>
> Is this the VIA chip set box? Evil stuff... ;-)

It's an Abit VP6 motherboard.  I've heard good reports from it, so that 
*better* not be the problem!!!

> Well, I certainly experienced f/s corruption when I compiled with RH's gcc
> 2.96-81, which went away when I recompiled with 2.91-66.

But what is the kernel shipped on the CD compiled with?  That's what I'm 
using. I know Red Hat uses 2.96 to compile their kernel, so I dunno if SGI 
did the same.

> You might be better off using a later XFS kernel from the CVS, but at this
> stage, I'd still be very leery of putting the f/s on a co-lo box 400 miles
> away... especially with VIA hardware, which is known to be broken in
> various ways (refer to Alan Cox, Andre Hedrick and Ingo Molnar's comments
> on this issue on linux-kernel etc.)

I think I'm starting to lean toward telling them to install the latest stable 
Debian with ext2......  :-)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>