xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: how to tell?

To: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: how to tell?
From: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 17:12:38 -0600
References: <3B228F91.3E63027C@idcomm.com> <3B2291FB.B5A59FD8@unixcircle.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010609235556.031a2c68@pop.xs4all.nl>
Reply-to: stimits@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Seth Mos wrote:
> 
> At 15:40 9-6-2001 -0600, D. Stimits wrote:
> >rollingblackout wrote:
> > >
> > > "D. Stimits" wrote:
> > > Ahh, so simple, thanks. Related to some other answers, it looks like the
> >/proc/partitions does not actually list filesystem type; and mtab is
> >good, but the mount command without arguments seems to be the easiest.
> >Thanks!
> 
> awk '{print $3}' '/proc/mounts'

Aha, that one works. The one I had viewed though was from
"cat /proc/partitions
Look at the 3rd item on each line"

/proc/mounts is yet another easy way to find out, but /proc/partitions
was the way that did not give the info.

> 
> >D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >PS: I always get two copies of anything sent to the sgi-devel list. I am
> >also subscribed to the announce list, perhaps everything is going to
> >both lists? Seems a bit like a minor quirk.
> 
> That's probably the result of the reply to all function in the mail clients.

That is probably it...it isn't the list sending both, but a reply to the
list that I receive, and the copy sent directly to me.

D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx

> 
> Bye
> 
> --
> Seth
> Every program has two purposes one for which
> it was written and another for which it wasn't
> I use the last kind.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>